The Writings of Sam Houston, Volume VI

WRJTINGS OF 5AM HOUSTON, 1858

493

statements which have induced the present Executive to act as he has done, when, perhaps, there would not have been a neces- sity for that action if the truth had been before him. If, however, you wish to subdue the Mormons, it can be done by volunteers in si>..1;y or ninety days; but if you undertake to do it by regulars, and increase your Army for that purpose, you will not be in a situation to commence operations efficiently in twleve months. It is said that volunteers are very expensive, and that it is more economical to employ regular troops. I do not see how they can be more expensive than regulars. You can get mounted volunteers as cheap as you can infantry soldiers of the United States-men who will provide themselves with their cavalry, and not exhaust the Treasury in purchasing it. For the reasons which I have stated, I shall oppose everything like an increase of the Army now and forever, in public and pri- vate Iife, at home and abroad, in word and in action. As a matter of principle, I am conscientiously opposed to increasing the Army in time of peace. I am not inclined, however; to disturb the present Army, but let them realize whatever may be expected from men who have given their lives to the service of their country. 1 Congressional Globe, Part 1, 1857-1858, pp. 646, 647. AGAINST INCREASE OF THE REGULAR ARMY, FEBRUARY 11, 1858 1 Mr. President, after the very eloquent and interesting speech of the Senator from Mississippi [Mr. Davis], I feel that I must of necessity, in defending what I believe to be correct policy, appear much to disadvantage. I have been impressed with the eloquence and propriety of his remarks so far as they are general in their application, but to this particular case, I do not conceive them applicable; but this may be owing to defective judgment or want of taste on my part. In the outset, however, I will ask of the honorable Senator to state in what instance I have used words derogatory to the Army? Certainly it was not my inten- tion to disparage that respectable class of gentlemen in the least; but he spoke of the hard terms I used in relation to the Army. [Davis explained the grounds for his statement.] Mr. Houston. Perhaps some terms may have escaped me that were improper for this body, as well as reflecting on the char- acter of gentlemen, which I should have regretted exceedingly. If to assume a position, and maintain it by a statement of facts is derogatory to the Army, that is not my fault, but my mis- fortune. When I said that our Army in time of peace was not

Powered by